Regular
Meeting of the Board of Directors
|
ROLL
CALL/CALL TO ORDER |
|
Chairperson
Alex Kennett called the regular meeting of the Santa
Clara County Open Space Authority (OSA) to order at 6:32 p.m. at the Open Space
Authority Administrative Office, 6830 Via del Oro, |
| |
|
Members
Present |
|
Alex
Kennett, |
| |
|
Members
Excused Absent |
|
None |
| |
|
Staff
Present |
|
Patrick
Congdon, General Manager Brett
Bennett, Legal Counsel Lauren
Crook, Clerk of the Board Rachel
Santos, Open Space Planner ll Josh
Lazarus, Open Space Planner ll |
| |
|
Public
Present |
|
Ken
Schreiber, Program Manager, Jan
Hintermeister Eric
Carruthers |
| |
|
PUBLIC
PRESENTATIONS |
|
None |
| |
|
ADOPTION
OF THE AGENDA |
|
The
motion passed 6-0.
(G.
Annable was not in attendance for the vote)
|
| |
|
MINUTES |
|
Approval
of August 10, 2006 Minutes A.
Kennett suggested a change to the CAC policy language on Page 5. CAC
will provide input on policy drafted by Authority Staff, and projects V.
Holtz moved to approve the August 10, 2006 minutes as amended. C. Edgerton seconded the
motion. The motion passed 6-0.
(G. Annable was not in attendance for the vote) |
| |
|
WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS |
|
L.
Crook distributed written communications to the
Board. A.
Kennett noted that a letter in support of General Manager, Patrick
Congdon, was received by Kyle Kroll, California Fish and Game Warden for
He
also noted that a questionnaire from the Santa Clara County Grand Jury was
received and responded to by Staff. |
| |
|
NEW
BUSINESS |
|
Agenda
Item #1: Presentation by Ken
Schreiber, Program Manager Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/
Natural Community Conservation Plan – Overview of Santa Clara Valley
Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan
(HCP/NCCP).
P.
Congdon welcomed Ken Schreiber of the Habitat Conservation Plan and noted
that Mr. Schreiber would be giving an overview presentation of the
Plan. He noted that the Open
Space Authority has in some way been involved for the past two years with
the development of the HCP. He turned the meeting over to K.
Schreiber. (G. Annable
arrived at 6:36). K.
Schreiber stated that he was the program manager for the HCP/NCCP since
September of 2004. He stated
that he would be giving an introduction to the Plan. Board
discussion ensued upon completion of the
presentation. |
|
Agenda
Item #2: Authorization
to Enter into a Management Agreement for Lands Owned by Valley
Transportation Authority (VTA) on Coyote Ridge in P.
Congdon stated that the item before the Board is to enter into a
Management Agreement with VTA on Coyote Ridge. P. Congdon introduced Tom
Fitzwater, stating that he has been his contact at VTA throughout the
process since 1999. P.
Congdon gave a PowerPoint presentation about the project and the
process. . G.
Annable moved to approve Resolution 06-13. M. Potter seconded the
motion. The
motion passed 6-0. |
|
|
|
Agenda Item #2:
Discussion and Direction
to Staff Regarding the Open Space Authority Becoming an Implementing
Partner Agency for Participation in the Santa Clara Valley Habitat
Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP). P.
Congdon introduced the item stating that he had hand outs from the East
Contra Costa HCP website. He
also handed out a Draft East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan
and Natural Community Conservation Plan. He noted that the documents answer
numerous questions the Board may have in regards to the Santa Clara Valley
HCP/NCCP. V.
Holtz distributed Questions for the Open Space Authority when Considering
Becoming an Implementing Partner of the HCP/NCCP. P.
Congdon stated he was looking for direction by the Board whether or not to
pursue becoming an HCP partner.
He stated that he was not asking them to make a determination about
partnership but was looking for broad direction
only. He
said that he was contacted by Ken Schreiber about attending a meeting of
the HCP in August. He stated
that that was the first time that the Authority was considered and asked
to be an implementing partner.
He said that the HCP was looking for a partner agency that has
experience with preserving and protecting lands in K.
Schreiber stated that the HCP/NCCP was interested in gathering together
agencies that already have experience and knowledge of preservation and
protection. He noted that
expertise was very important.
He noted that one of the key components that the Authority brings
to the table is their expertise.
He said that another benefit that the Authority brings to the table
is that they bring the fact that they are an existing organization and its
structure. K.
Schreiber continued with his presentation. He stated, in regards to
Implementing Partners, that it was determined among the current partners,
that it would be a good idea to bring the Open Space Authority and
Board
discussion continued. (changed
to CD #2 (78 minutes)) Board
discussion continued. Role
of the Open Space Authority in implementing the program would be out on
the timeline in 2008 or 2009.
He noted that the OSA being an interim manager would likely be very
soon, in two to three months, C.
Edgerton asked if the Board could come to consensus to move
forward. A.
Kennett opened the discussion to public comment. E.
Carruthers stated he thought the Authority was headed in the right
direction with the HCP/NCCP. A.
Kennett asked for consensus from the Board to support moving forward in
obtaining further information. By
a show of hands, the Board gave their unanimous
consensus. |
| |
|
|
|
Agenda Item #3:
Discussion and Direction
to Staff Regarding the Open Space Authority Becoming the Holder of
Mitigation/Compensation Fees Associated with the P.
Congdon introduced the item stating that he was approached by VTA to be
considered as an interim holder of mitigation/compensation fees associated
with the Santa Clara Valley NCP/NCCP. Board
discussion continued. E.
Carruthers asked how much detailed accounting the Authority is going to be
asked to accomplish. P.
Congdon stated that the accounting time would not be at all
significant. He said that the
Authority would be tracking each deposit and
withdrawal. He
asked the Board for their consensus to move forward and for staff to bring
a recommendation to the Board at the next meeting. By
a show of hands, the Board showed their unanimous consensus to continue
obtaining information about becoming the holder of
mitigation/compensation fees associated with the HCP/NCCP. |
| |
|
|
|
Agenda Item #4:
Adopt Proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration and the associated Mitigation Monitoring Program for
the Rancho Canada del Oro Open Space Preserve Proposed Trail
Development. P.
Congdon introduced the item stating that R. Santos and J. Lazarus had
worked extensively on preparing the CEQA documentation for the Proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Associated Mitigation Monitoring
Program for Rancho Canada del Oro Open Space Preserve Trail Development
Plan. P.
Congdon stated that the Authority had received written comments from Santa
Clara County Parks and Recreation Department related to the Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the R.
Santos reviewed the Trail Development Project. She described the project, stating
that it consists of two trails
totaling approximately 3 1/3 miles within the Authority’s Rancho Canada
del Oro Open Space Preserve.
The first trail, Llagas Creek Loop Trail, will be Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant and will be 1/3 of a mile long all of
which will be new trail construction. The second trail, Mayfair Ranch
Trail, will be an approximately 3-mile-long multi-use (allowing use by
hikers, bicyclist and equestrians) trail. It will require approximately 2
miles of new trail construction and utilize roughly one mile of existing
ranch road to complete the trail.
Development and completion of the Mayfair Ranch Trail will also
require (1) 40’ clear span fiberglass bridge and (3) small clear span
structures of varying lengths of 5-10 feet. A.
Kennett asked about the timeframe of the project. P.
Congdon stated that staff had received approval from the California
Department of Fish and Game to begin construction of the trail throughout
the winter as long as the Authority used best practices for erosion
control in the process. He
said that the plan was to wait to begin the project until there was more
moisture in the soil for better soil compaction. R.
Santos stated that there were no significant comments received by the
public during the public comment period. Board
discussion ensued. J.
Foran noted that Santa Clara County Parks was scheduled to begin work on
their Trail Master Plan for P.
Congdon stated that, yes; it was likely that the Authority would have time
to work with County Parks to look at a dual-regional trail system. He said planning for future trails
will take place right away but due to current staffing and funding issues
as well as Work Plan prioritization for planning and development of the
Milpitas-Berryessa trail system, further planning for Rancho would take
place but not be built out. P.
Congdon noted that he had spoken in detail with Mark Fredericks from
County Parks and they discussed how management of the trail system would
take place. He said that it
seemed that Mr. Fredericks seemed more comfortable with the Authority’s
plans. He
also said the Authority, during the last mitigated negative declaration
for the Rancho Staging Area, heard concerns from some of the neighbors and
he had made commitments in addressing those concerns. He said he wanted to follow up
regarding those concerns. He
said that the Authority would be monitoring the current project and its
impact on the community just as had been done with the Staging Area
Project. He
said that there was quite a bit of community concern about what the impact
of the staging area would be at the time of that project’s approval. In particular, he said there was a
neighbor, Mr. Bothwell, who listed a number of concerns such as traffic
control, trespassing, parking, fire protection and aesthetic values. He stated that the Authority
implemented a monitoring program, from the first day, where a staff member
is present in the parking lot, at most times during the day to monitor the
activities going on and have kept a number statistics. He said that staff has kept in
contact with Mr. Bothwell about his needs. He noted that because of the
information received from the statistics, the Authority has put up
additional No Parking signs.
He said the Authority has moved cars that were left or parked on
He
said that in regards to the new project, staff would be implementing a
similar monitoring program.
He stated staff will be concentrating their efforts in the areas
where potential problems could come up. He said staff would also look to
the bicycle community and create some A.
Kennett opened the meeting for the public hearing. (There
were no comments from the public.) A.
Kennett
closed the public comment period. Motion:
G. Annable moved to adopt
Resolution 06-27. M. Potter
seconded the motion. The
motion passed 7-0. |
| |
|
|
|
Agenda Item #5: Approve
the Rancho R.
Santos stated that as part of the CEQA process, the Board is required to
approve the project after approval of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration. Motion: G. Annable moved to Resolution
06-28. C. Edgerton seconded
the motion. The
motion passed 7-0. |
| |
|
CONSENT
CALENDAR |
|
No
items on Consent Calendar |
| |
|
INFORMATIONAL
REPORTS |
| |||
|
CAC
Committee Update (from liaisons) |
|
G.
Annable stated that the CAC was beginning work on the Agriculture Project
Study. |
| |
|
Agricultural
Project Update |
|
J.
Hintermeister stated that the CAC already had a list of agencies to send
an introductory letter to asking them if they would be interested in
participating in the question and information gathering process for the
Authority’s |
| |
|
Acquisition
Policy Committee |
|
J.
Foran noted that a meeting was scheduled for the following
week. |
| |
|
Acquisition
Committee |
|
G.
Annable stated that the Committee did meet. She said the Authority has
approximately $6.5 million to spend on acquisition. She noted that the Dempsey
property is back on the market. |
| |
|
Use
& Management Committee |
|
S.
Hall noted that the last meeting had been
cancelled. |
| |
|
Administration
& Budget Committee |
|
P.
Congdon stated that the Committee discussed the granting of Open Space
Authority funds and developing a policy and procedure for accepting and
processing requests. He also
noted that the Committee was going to be reviewing CAC
applications. V.
Holtz asked to put an item on the agenda for the next Board meeting to
recommend and approve a candidate for the District 5 Representative for
the CAC. |
| |
|
General
Manager’s Report |
|
P.
Congdon noted that the Authority was moving towards completion of the VTA
management agreement on Coyote Ridge. He said that the Authority, on
behalf of VTA, has been monitoring the property. He said that there had been a fire
on a portion of the property which burned about 10 acres of red legged
frog habitat. He said that he
prepared a report of his evaluation of the property. He noted that he sent the report
to U.S. Fish and Wildlife which included his observations and his
recommendation for improvements to the property. He stated that this was a good
example of the valuable contacts that had been made through the HCP
process. He stated that
face-to-face meetings with U.S. Fish and Wildlife have facilitated the
process and have provided added assurance that the Authority will do what
we say we’re going to do. |
| |
|
|
No
Report. |
| ||
|
Board
Member Reports |
|
V.
Holtz noted that she, P. Congdon, and C. Edgerton attended the LAFCO Ag
Mitigation meeting. G.
Annable stated she would be giving a presentation to the Almaden Cycle
Touring Club. She asked V.
Holtz to join her in a presentation to the Cambrian Community
Council. S.
Hall noted that the County has approved and is implementing the Viewshed
Protection Ordinance. J.
Foran stated that the CSDA Annual Conference is Sept 26, 27, and
28. P.
Congdon gave a presentation to The Villages and they made a $100 donation
to the Authority. V.
Holtz noted that the Authority would be at the Santa Clara Art and Wine
Festival this weekend. |
| |
|
CONVENED
TO CLOSED SESSION |
|
9:13
p.m. |
| |
|
RETURN
FROM CLOSED SESSION |
|
9:55
p.m. There were no reportable actions.
|
| |
|
Adjournment |
|
Meeting
was adjourned at 9:55 p.m. |
| |
Respectfully
submitted,
Lauren Crook, Clerk of the
Board